Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/peerreview
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This template is used on 2,400,000+ pages, or roughly 5965% of all pages. To avoid major disruption and server load, any changes should be tested in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. The tested changes can be added to this page in a single edit. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
| Syntax |
|---|
{{WPBannerMeta
|PROJECT =
|BANNER_NAME = {{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}
|category={{{category|}}}
|listas = {{{listas|}}}
...
|HOOK_NOTE = <!--
-->{{WPBannerMeta/hooks/peerreview
|BANNER_NAME = {{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}
|category={{{category|}}}
|peer review = {{{**PARAMETER**|}}}
|old peer review = {{{**PARAMETER**|}}}
|LINK =
|IMAGE =
|CAT =
|OLD_CAT =
|title = {{{**PARAMETER**|}}}
}}
...
}}
|
This hook enables a peer review process to be integrated into a project banner. It should be attached to the |HOOK_NOTE= hook. The following parameters are used:
category(Required) – the 'category' parameter must be passed through the template to enable category optout. Eg:category={{{category|}}}peer review(Required) – the parameter that will trigger the active peer review note; should be passed through. Eg:peer review={{{peer-review|}}}old peer review(Required) – the parameter that will trigger the old peer review note; should be passed through. Eg:old peer review={{{old-peer-review|}}}LINK(Required) – the full link to where the review for this particular article is held. Eg:Wikipedia:WikiProject Tulips/AssessmentIMAGE– the name of the image to use. If not specified then
is used.CAT– if defined, pages using|peer review=yeswill be categorised into this category. Eg:Requests for Tulips peer review→ Category:Requests for Tulips peer reviewOLD_CAT– if defined, pages using|old peer review=yeswill be categorised into this category. Eg:Old requests for Tulips peer review→ Category:Old requests for Tulips peer reviewtitle→ If the page has been moved since it was reviewed, specify the old page title (the one the review was archived under) to make the link point correctly to the review.INVALID_CAT– if defined, pages using|peer review=yeswithout a valid peer review page existing be categorised into this category.