Usage

Blank template:

{{DYK checklist
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
|newness      = <!---Was the article created, expanded (5x), moved to mainspace, or promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of the nomination?--->
|length       = <!---Is the article at least 1500 characters long and not a stub?--->
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
|sourced      = <!---Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?--->
|neutral      = <!---Does the article cover all major viewpoints in a straightforward manner without using promotional or overly negative language?--->
|plagiarismfree = <!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?--->
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
|hookcited    = <!---Check to see if the hook fact is backed by a source. If it is, check the source (if readily available) and make sure it contains the fact and is reliable. "AGF" (assume good faith) may be entered if hook it cited to an offline source--->
|hookinterest = <!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?--->
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
|picfree      = <!---If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed?  If no picture is used, put "NA"--->
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
|picclear     = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
|qpq          = <!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"--->
|status       = <!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look. This field determines the review icon displayed. Note that if "y", the green tick will be used unless the "hookcited" field has "AGF", in which case the gray AGF tick will be used instead.--->
|comments     = <!---Put any other comments you may have here--->
|sign         = ~~~~<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
}}

Blank template without comments:

{{DYK checklist
|newness      = 
|length       = 
|eligibilityother = 
|sourced      = 
|neutral      = 
|plagiarismfree = 
|policyother  = 
|hookcited    = 
|hookinterest = 
|hookother    = 
|picfree      = 
|picused      = 
|picclear     = 
|qpq          = 
|status       = 
|comments     = 
|sign         = 
}}

TemplateData

Template for reviewing Did You Know nominations. If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is.

Template parameters

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
newnessnewness

Was the article created, expanded (5x), moved to mainspace, or promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of the nomination?

Suggested values
y
Unknownrequired
lengthlength

Is the article at least 1500 characters long and not a stub?

Suggested values
y
Unknownrequired
eligibilityeligibility

Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none

Unknownsuggested
sourcedsourced

Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?

Suggested values
y
Unknownrequired
neutralneutral

Does the article cover all major viewpoints in a straightforward manner without using promotional or overly negative language?

Suggested values
y
Unknownrequired
Plagiarism free?plagiarismfree

Is the article free of material copied from other sources?

Suggested values
y
Unknownrequired
Other policy problemspolicyother

Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none.

Unknownsuggested
Hook cited?hookcited

Check to see if the hook fact is backed by a source. If it is, check the source (if readily available) and make sure it contains the fact and is reliable. "AGF" (assume good faith) may be entered if hook it cited to an offline source

Suggested values
y AGF
Unknownrequired
Hook interesthookinterest

Is the hook reasonably interesting?

Suggested values
y
Unknownrequired
Other hook problemshookother

Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none.

Unknownsuggested
Picture free?picfree

If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed? If no picture is used, put "NA".

Suggested values
y NA
Unknownrequired
Picture used?picused

Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)? If no picture is used, leave blank.

Suggested values
y
Unknownsuggested
Picture clear?picclear

Is the picture easily discernible at 100px? If no picture is used, leave blank.

Suggested values
y
Unknownsuggested
QPQqpq

Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA".

Suggested values
y NA
Unknownrequired
statusstatus

Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look. This field determines the review icon displayed. Note that if "y", the green tick will be used unless the "hookcited" field has "AGF", in which case the gray AGF tick will be used instead.

Suggested values
y ? maybe no again
Unknownrequired
commentscomments

Put any other comments you may have here.

Unknownsuggested
signsign

Your signature. Generally, can be left as is.

Auto value
~~~~
Unknownrequired