Template:Academic-written review/doc

&#x3c;!-- Please place categories where indicated at the bottom of this page and interwikis at Wikidata (see Wikidata) --&#x3e;

Usage
This template is based off the Academic Peer Reviewed template and is meant for Wikipedia articles updated as part of a dual publication model used by journals to incentivize scholarly contributions to Wikipedia. Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the Wikipedia version to the community at large. &#x3c;pre&#x3e;

&#x3c;/pre&#x3e;

Example with QID
&#x3c;pre&#x3e;

&#x3c;/pre&#x3e;

Produces:

Example without QID
&#x3c;pre&#x3e;

&#x3c;/pre&#x3e;

Produces:

Caveats
Note that this template transcludes the Cite Journal Template, and inherits one of the weaknesses/issues of said template. The author list must be formatted in a certain way or it will give errors when using the &#x3c;code&#x3e;&#x3c;nowiki&#x3e;&#x3c;/nowiki&#x3e;&#x3c;/code&#x3e; parameter. If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with &#x3c;code&#x3e;&#x3c;nowiki&#x3e;&#x3c;/nowiki&#x3e;&#x3c;/code&#x3e;. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the &#x3c;code&#x3e;&#x3c;nowiki&#x3e;&#x3c;/nowiki&#x3e;&#x3c;/code&#x3e; instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a citation's metadata, and users consuming cs1|2 citations via the metadata will find that the citation is missing authors.

Categories for pages using these templates

 * Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
 * Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding articles published in