Template:Request edit/doc

How to use
Go to the article's Talk page and click the  tab. Add and fill in the following:

~
 * Specific text to be added or removed: ADD TEXT HERE
 * Reason for the change: ADD TEXT HERE
 * References supporting change: ADD URL AT LEAST

In further detail
 * 1) Create a   on the talk page, with a subject like
 * 2) In the large empty text area, type
 * 3) Underneath this, write out the specific changes you want made to the article. Volunteers are less likely to respond to unclear or open-ended requests.
 * 4) At the end, sign the post using four tildes: ~
 * 5) Click on the   button and have a look to make sure the request appears the way you want it to
 * 6) If you wish to make any corrections or additions, you may do so in the edit box below the preview (scroll down to see this box); preview your post as many times as you wish, and when you are satisfied, click on the   button

Request options
= request edit/request for requested edits. Post on the article talk page, in a thread that describes the edit to be made. The template automatically adds the request to the list of edits requested and Category:Wikipedia requested edits.

= request edit/significant same function as – use for more substantial changes.

= request edit/new for new editors.

Response options

 * = request edit/accepted for accepted edits that have been implemented; adds the request to Category:Implemented requested edits (the template also accepts yes or yes)
 * = request edit/proceed for allowing the COI editor to directly implement the requested edits to article themselves.
 * = request edit/partial for partially completed requests adds the request to Category:Partially implemented requested edits
 * = request edit/declined for declined request; adds the request to Category:Declined requested edits

Additional parameters
When declining a request, either using  or , an optional second parameter can be given to further explain why the request was declined (for example,  for a partial-block decline for advertising). The additional text values are given below.
 * : Some or all of the changes may be promotional in tone.
 * :Some or all of the changes weren't supported by neutral, independent, reliable sources. Consider re-submitting with content based on media, books and scholarly works.
 * :The suggested edits are good, but the reviewer felt omissions in the content may create balance issues.
 * :The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist.
 * :The reviewer would like to request the editor with a COI attempt to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area first.
 * :The reviewer requests that the COI editor implement the proposed edits directly.
 * : The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.
 * :A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article.
 * :A consensus could not be reached.
 * :Adds a custom rationale supplied by the editor

Please see the list of requested edits at the page to see how you can help!